<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SubmitMyMusic.com &#187; Streaming Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.submitmymusic.com/tag/streaming-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.submitmymusic.com</link>
	<description>let your music be heard</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:29:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Launch Of Spotify Delayed</title>
		<link>http://www.submitmymusic.com/2010/07/u-s-launch-of-spotify-delayed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.submitmymusic.com/2010/07/u-s-launch-of-spotify-delayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Submit My Music</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spotify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.submitmymusic.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billboard reports that Spotify&#8217;s licensing negotiations with the major music labels have reverted back to square one. Having failed to persuade the major record labels to go along with its vision for a U.S. version of the popular European service, Spotify in the last month has approached the labels with a clean slate to determine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billboard reports that Spotify&#8217;s licensing negotiations with the major music labels have reverted back to square one. Having failed to persuade the major record labels to go along with its vision for a U.S. version of the popular European service, Spotify in the last month has approached the labels with a clean slate to determine what type of service would be possible to launch before the end of the year.</p>
<p>Spotify has been working on a U.S. launch for almost two years, originally expecting to go live in this market in 2009. But some labels, most notably Warner Music Group, have gone on record stating their displeasure with the &#8220;freemium&#8221; model that Spotify champions, which offers unlimited streaming for free under an ad supported model designed to drive users to a premium paid service that eliminates ads and offers mobile access.</p>
<p>Spotify CEO Daniel Ek has insisted he wants to offer Spotify in the U.S. under a similar sort of model, with perhaps some changes to the length of time that the free version would be available.</p>
<p>Billboard&#8217;s sources say Spotify is open to short-term deals that would allow it to launch a framework of the service by the end of this year, designed to evolve over time as the in-dispute elements are revisited.</p>
<p>Find out more about Spotify <a href="http://www.spotify.com/nl/help/faq/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.submitmymusic.com/2010/07/u-s-launch-of-spotify-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Streaming Services Continue To Grow</title>
		<link>http://www.submitmymusic.com/2010/07/streaming-services-continue-to-grow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.submitmymusic.com/2010/07/streaming-services-continue-to-grow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Submit My Music</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.submitmymusic.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[paidContent:UK recently published a overview of the most popular on demand streaming services around the world. You can find the full overview here, but The Orchard&#8217;s Daily Rind Blog has published a quick recap: Rhapsody remains ahead of the pack with the largest published subscriber base of close to 675,000 subscribers, although this number has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/" target="_blank">paidContent:UK</a> recently published a overview of the most popular on demand streaming services around the world. You can find the full overview <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/table/unlimitedmusic" target="_blank">here</a>, but The Orchard&#8217;s <a href="http://www.dailyrindblog.com/?p=1099#more-1099" target="_blank">Daily Rind Blog</a> has published a quick recap:</p>
<p><strong>Rhapsody</strong> remains ahead of the pack with the largest published subscriber base of close to 675,000 subscribers, although this number has been steadily declining.</p>
<p><strong>Napster </strong>has continued to be a well-known brand name, despite being &#8220;<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/08/napster_ad_flop/" target="_blank">the biggest loser</a>&#8221; of the 2005 Super Bowl Ads.</p>
<p><strong>MOG</strong> is fairly new service in the US (and soon UK) that offers unlimited streaming ($9.99/month) with a catalog of 8 million songs. Last week, MOG unveiled its long anticipated mobile app for the iPhone and Android.</p>
<p><strong>Apple</strong> is a wild card. Shortly after Apple shut down recently purchased Lala, many speculated that Apple will step up with a global service of their own. Yet, the future of Apple’s place in online music streaming still remains unknown.</p>
<p>Same goes for <strong>Google</strong>, who recently <a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3ic0d7c3a6d02f0164577e6f36cf275639" target="_blank">hired music attorney Elizabeth Moody</a>. They are rumored to launch a music service later this year along with the Android 3.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.submitmymusic.com/2010/07/streaming-services-continue-to-grow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

